Harada Method vs. SMART Goals: Why 64 Actions Beat 5

What are SMART goals and where did they come from?

SMART goals were introduced by George Doran in a 1981 paper published in Management Review. The acronym stands for Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. The framework helps managers and individuals write clearer objective statements instead of vague aspirations like "improve sales" or "get healthier."

The power of SMART is its simplicity. You run any fuzzy goal through five filters to sharpen it. "I want to get fit" becomes "I will run a 5K in under 30 minutes by June 1." The goal is now concrete and has a deadline. If you have ever written a performance review or a New Year's resolution, you have probably encountered SMART.

For a concrete example, see [_sales goals_](https://open64.us/goals/career/sales-goals-examples).

What is the limitation of SMART goals?

SMART gives you a well-formed goal statement. It does not give you a plan to achieve it. That is the critical gap.

Consider the 5K example: "Run a 5K in under 30 minutes by June 1." It passes all five SMART filters. But what do you do on Monday morning? SMART does not tell you. You have a clear destination and no map.

This is why many people set SMART goals and still fail. The problem was never the goal itself. It was the absence of a structured action plan connecting today's behavior to the future outcome.

SMART also treats goals in isolation. Training for a 5K touches nutrition, sleep, scheduling, equipment, and mental toughness. A single goal statement cannot capture all of that.

How does the Harada Method go beyond SMART?

The Harada Method was developed by Takashi Harada, a Japanese track and field coach at Naniwa Sogo High School. He created the system to help underperforming student athletes build the daily habits and personal responsibility needed to win. His athletes went from last place to producing 13 gold medalists.

Where SMART stops at the goal statement, the Harada Method starts with purpose and works outward. You identify your deep reason for pursuing the goal, then decompose it into 8 supporting pillars. Each pillar gets 8 specific actions. That gives you 64 concrete things to do.

The result is a 9x9 grid (sometimes called the Mandala Chart) with your central goal in the middle and 64 actions surrounding it. Every action is something you can execute on a given day.

What does this look like with a real goal?

Let's compare both approaches with the same goal: running a 5K in under 30 minutes by June 1.

The SMART version gives you one sentence: "I will run a 5K in under 30 minutes by June 1, 2026." Specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, time-bound. Done. Now figure out the rest yourself.

The Harada Method version starts with purpose ("I want to prove to myself I can commit to something hard") and builds out 8 pillars. A few examples:

Training pillar: Run 3x per week, do interval training on Tuesdays, add 0.5 miles per week to long runs, track pace after every run, do a practice 5K by week 6, join a local running group, follow a couch-to-5K plan for month one, do a cooldown walk after every run.

Nutrition pillar: Eat protein within 1 hour of running, drink 64oz of water daily, cut alcohol on training days, prep meals on Sundays, eat a banana 30 minutes before runs, track food for the first 2 weeks, research runner nutrition basics, eliminate sugary drinks on weekdays.

Recovery pillar: Sleep 7+ hours on training nights, foam roll after every run, take rest days seriously, stretch 10 minutes post-run, ice knees if sore, do yoga once per week, schedule a sports massage monthly, track sleep quality.

That is 24 actions from just 3 pillars. You would fill 5 more covering mindset, scheduling, gear, social support, and progress tracking. The SMART goal is the center of the grid. But now it has 64 legs to stand on instead of standing alone.

For a concrete example, see [_marketing manager goals_](https://open64.us/goals/career/marketing-manager-goals-examples).

When is SMART enough vs. when do you need 64 actions?

SMART goals work well for simple, contained objectives. "Save $500 by April" or "Read 2 books this month" are straightforward enough that a clear goal statement might be all you need. The path is obvious and does not require coordination across multiple life areas.

You need the 64-action approach when the goal is complex, multi-dimensional, or requires sustained effort over months. Career transitions, fitness transformations, launching a business, learning a new skill deeply. These goals fail not because people cannot define them clearly, but because people cannot sustain the dozens of supporting behaviors that make them possible.

The honest truth is that SMART and the Harada Method are not competitors. SMART is a formatting tool for goal statements. The Harada Method is a complete achievement system. You can (and should) make each of your 64 actions SMART. The frameworks are complementary, but only one of them gives you a daily playbook.

How does Open64 give you the structure to go beyond SMART?

Open64 is a free Chrome extension that replaces your new tab with the Harada Method's 64-cell goal grid. Every time you open a new tab, you see your central goal surrounded by 8 pillars and 64 actions.

Instead of writing a SMART goal on a sticky note and forgetting it, you build out the full grid. Open64 gives you the structure: the 9x9 layout, editable cells for each action, and your goal front and center every time you open your browser. You can start from a blank grid or use built-in templates to get going.

The daily visibility is what makes it stick. SMART goals live in a document you opened once. Your Open64 grid lives on every new tab. That constant reinforcement turns 64 abstract actions into a system you actually follow.

Frequently Asked Questions